检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李孝龙 LI Xiao-long(Luzhong Mining Co Ltd,Laiwu 271100,Shandong,China)
出 处:《矿冶工程》2021年第4期57-60,共4页Mining and Metallurgical Engineering
摘 要:针对某微细粒磁铁矿进行了全磁选流程和磁选-反浮选流程对比试验研究。结果表明,在最终磨矿细度相当的情况下,2种工艺流程都获得了产率48%左右、TFe品位66%左右、回收率80%左右的铁精矿指标,而采用磁选-反浮选流程的第三段磨矿量比全磁选流程减少了2/3。磁选-反浮选流程具有显著的节能降耗优势。The comparison was performed between the beneficiation results of a fine-grained magnetite ore processed by adopting a unitary low intensity magnetic separation(LIMS)flowsheet and a LIMS-reverse flotation flowsheet.It is shown that similar indices,namely,a yield about 48%,TFe grade about 66%and iron recovery about 80%,can be obtained with both flowsheet with the ore ground to a comparable fineness.However,compared with the unitary LIMS process,the ore mass for the third grinding stage of the LIMS-reverse flotation flowsheet was reduced by nearly two-thirds.Therefore,it possesses significant advantages for energy conservation and consumption reduction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38