英国学派中的基本制度概念与国际社会观念的关联:共识与争鸣  

The Correlation Between the Fundamental Institutions and the Notion of International Society on the English School: Consensus and Differences

作　　者：章前明[1] Zhang Qianming(School of Marxism,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学马克思主义学院,浙江杭州310058

出　　处：《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2021年第4期22-35,共14页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences

基　　金：浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“建构东亚安全共同体的新路径研究”(18NDJC164YB)。

摘　　要：基本制度概念是国际社会理论的基石,也是英国学派有别于新自由制度主义的核心概念。长期以来,国际关系学界重视英国学派的制度概念与新自由制度主义机制理论的比较研究,而相对忽视该学派学者在基本制度概念上的认识差异及其与国际社会观念之间关系的研究。实际上,英国学派学者在基本制度概念的理解上虽然存有一些共识,如基本制度包括宪政性制度和共处制度两个层次,主权是国际社会的宪政性制度,外交和国际法等共处制度是从主权原则中派生出来的;但同时,他们在基本制度如何构成以及怎样互动的认识上,尤其是在主权与人权关系的认识上存在明显分歧,而这些分歧是导致他们在国际社会的认识上存在多元主义、社会连带主义等多元化发展的重要原因。英国学派学者关于基本制度概念及其与国际社会观念之间关系的争论,对当今国际社会推动人类命运共同体建设有着重要启示。Although the concept of "fundamental institutions" is the corner stone of the International Social Theory and "international society" is the core concept of the English School, the English School’scholars have reached no agreement on what is meant by international society. For a long time, scholars of international relations have devoted themselves to telling the similarity/difference between the concept of institution proposed by the English School and the regime theory by Neo-Liberal Institutionalism, paying little attention to the inter-connection between understandings of the English School ’ s scholars on the concepts of fundamental institution and the notion of international society.This paper, departing from defining fundamental institution, gives a detailed analysis of the internal connection between the two, especially the scholars’ consensus/dispute over the concept. Their noteworthy consensus is a recognition that, fundamental institutions consist of "constitutional institution" and "coexistence institution" and make up a hierarchical system in which sovereignty is the constitutional institution of international society while diplomacy and international law is something derived from principle of sovereignty. This consensus defines what is meant by fundamental institution and what international society is, and tells institutionalism by the English School apart from the regime theory by Neo-Liberal Institutionalism. Their dispute lies in what fundamental institution consists of and how they interact with each other, rather than the type of institution in Buzan’s term. These differences are the important reasons that lead to the diversified understandings as pluralism and solidarism, etc. in their understanding of the idea of the international society.The English School Scholars headed by Hedley Bull, James Mayall and Robert Jackson divided over what consists of fundamental institution, insist that sovereignty and non-intervention be the basic principles of international society;nation state be th

关 键 词：基本制度 英国学派 国际社会观念 多元主义 社会连带主义 

分 类 号：D80[政治法律—政治学]