论阿尼森对公平原则的修正与辩护  

On Richard Arneson's Revisions and Defenses of the Principle of Fairness

作　　者：毛兴贵[1] Mao Xinggui

机构地区：[1]西南大学哲学系

出　　处：《哲学门》2016年第2期271-283,共13页Beida Journal of Philosophy

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“当代西方政治哲学中的自由理论跟踪研究”(13BZZ011)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：由哈特和罗尔斯提出的自愿主义公平原则理论面临着诸多困境,受到诺齐克和西蒙斯的严厉批评;阿尼森通过放弃公平原则的自愿主义立场从而对公平原则进行了重大修正,同时也正面回应了诺齐克与西蒙斯对公平原则的批评;不过阿尼森的回应因为缺乏说服力,因此并不能拯救政治义务的公平原则理论。The voluntarist theory of the principle of fairness,which is advocated by John Rawls and H.L.A.Hart,has a lot of difficulties and is severely criticized by Robert Nozick and John Simmons.Richard Ameson improves upon the principle of fairness greatly by abandoning the voluntarist position and responds to the criticisms of Nozick and Simmons.However,due to their lack of persuasiveness,these responses fail to deliver the theory of fairness from its predicament.

关 键 词：公平原则 自愿主义 诺齐克 西蒙斯 私有财产权 接 受利益 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]