从江南义疏到《周易正义》——隋唐《周易》义疏学中的儒佛之争  

From the Southern Commentaries to Zhouyizhengyi-The Argument between Confucianism and Buddhism in Sui and Tang Dynasty

作　　者：谷继明[1] Gu Jiming

机构地区：[1]同济大学哲学系

出　　处：《哲学门》2013年第2期123-139,共17页Beida Journal of Philosophy

摘　　要：儒学在唐代并非沉默无为。面对佛教的挑战,以孔颖达为代表的儒家学者通过修撰《周易正义》来整肃儒家的佛教浸染。通过对比“江南义疏”与《周易正义》的不同,我们可以看出孔颖达裁剪的着重点及其用意所在,进而看到传统经学的义疏之学中思想的角逐。由于旧疏的亡失,对于“江南义疏”的认识以前有较大的缺失;但藏于日本的古抄本《讲周易疏论家义记》却能丰富我们的视野,并重新审视在《周易》方面南北朝义疏到唐代的变化。这段认识对宋代理学的起源研究也有启发意义。In the Tang Dynasty Confucianism was not in silence.On the challenge of Buddhism,Kong Yingda and many other Confucian scholars tried to limit Buddhism’s influence by editing and writing Zhouyizhengyi or the orthodox commentaries of Zhouyi.Kong Yingda’s temptation can be foundifwecompare Zhouyizhengyiwiththe Southern Commentaries.Of course mostofthe Southern Commentaries hasbeenlost whichissodif-ficult for us to research.Fortunately one of these old commentaries Jiang Zhouyi Shulunjia Yiji(Records of the discussion and commentary onZhouyi)is stilled kept in Japan,which can broaden our horizons.This study can also advance our knowledge of the origin of the Neo-Confucianism.

关 键 词：《周易正义》 三教 《讲周易疏论家义记》 义疏学 

分 类 号：I20[文学—中国文学]