城市生活垃圾处理收费模式比选研究  

Comparison and selection of charge models for municipal solid waste treatment

作　　者：吕露[1] 陈海滨[1] 苗雨[1] 汪俊时 曹方琼 欧阳秀莉 万能[1] 黄尧 阮滨 段盼盼 LV Lu;CHEN Haibin;MIAO Yu;WANG Junshi;CAO Fangqiong;OUYANG Xiuli;WAN Neng;HUANG Yao;RUAN Bin;DUAN PanPan(1 Huazhong LDiversity of Science and Technology,Wzuhan 430074,China;Wuhan Huaxi Science and Technology Development Co.,Ltd.,Wzuhan 430070,China)

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学,武汉430074 [2]武汉华曦科技发展有限公司,武汉430070

出　　处：《环境与可持续发展》2021年第4期84-87,共4页Environment and Sustainable Development

摘　　要：本文从经济、环境、社会、技术四个方面构建了9个评价指标,利用网络层次分析法(ANP)—熵值法综合确定各指标权重,基于集对分析方法构建城市生活垃圾处理收费模式比选模型。以沈阳市为例开展实证研究,针对沈阳市的实际情况设计了四种具体的收费模式,构建优、良、中、差四个等级,对收费模式进行评价和选择。结果显示,"水消费系数法"收费模式为当前形势及条件下适宜的生活垃圾处理收费模式,能解决当前存在的垃圾处理费收缴率低和收费成本高的难题。This article constructs nine evaluation indicators from four aspects of economy, environment, society and technology.The weights of each indicator were comprehensively determined using the ANP-entropy weight method, and comparison and selection model of charging models for municipal solid waste treatment was constructed based on set pair analysis.Then Shenyang City, as an example, is carried out empirical research.According to the actual situation of Shenyang City, four specific charging models are designed.Four grades of excellent, good, medium and poor are designed to evaluate and select the charging mode.The results show that the Water Consumption Coefficient Method charging model is an appropriate domestic waste treatment charging model under the current situation and conditions, which can solve the current problems of low collection rate of waste treatment fees and high cost of charges.

关 键 词：“水消费系数法” 按量收费 ANP—熵值法 集对分析法 

分 类 号：X32[环境科学与工程—环境工程] X7