检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张磊[1] 佟琳[1] 曾宪涛 刘少南[3] 张华敏[4] ZHANG Lei;TONG Lin;ZENG Xian-tao;LIU Shao-nan;ZHANG Hua-min(Institute of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,China;Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine,Wuhan University,The Second Clinical College,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,China;Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510120,China;Institute of Chinese Meteria Medica,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,China)
机构地区:[1]中国中医科学院中医药信息研究所,北京100700 [2]武汉大学中南医院循证与转化医学中心,武汉大学循证与转化医学中心,武汉大学第二临床学院,湖北武汉430071 [3]广东省中医院,广东广州510120 [4]中国中医科学院中药研究所,北京100700
出 处:《中国中医药图书情报杂志》2021年第5期66-69,共4页Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science for Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:国家重点研发计划(2019YFC1709802);国家卫健委医管中心委托课题([2019]099号);中国中医科学院基本科研业务费自主选题(ZZ140308)。
摘 要:文章系统地论述了中医古籍证据质量评价标准与分级标准的相关研究现状,分析了中医药领域古籍证据质量评价与分级面临的主要问题与研究难点。循证中医古籍证据的研究尚处于起步阶段,尤其在古籍证据的评价体系建立及评价指标的设置方面尚需探索。This article systematically discussed the current research status of the evaluating and grading of evidence quality of ancient TCM books,and analyzed the main problems and difficulties in the evaluating and grading of evidence quality of ancient TCM books.The research on the evidence of ancient TCM books is still in its infancy,especially in the establishment of the evaluation system of ancient books and the establishment of the evaluation indexes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38