循证护理在子宫切口妊娠护理中的应用效果评价  

Evaluation of Application Effect of Evidence-based Nursing in Pregnancy Nursing of Uterine Incision

作　　者：王丽静 WANG Lijing(Liaoning Health Industry Group Iron Coal General Hospital,Tieling 112700,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁省健康产业集团铁煤总医院,辽宁铁岭112700

出　　处：《中国医药指南》2021年第25期189-190,193,共3页Guide of China Medicine

摘　　要：目的探讨分析对子宫切口妊娠患者开展循证护理的临床应用效果。方法选取2016年2月至2018年10月本院收治的56例子宫切口妊娠患者开展分组研究。分别为常规护理组(28例)以及循证护理组(28例),分别实施常规护理、循证护理进行干预。比较两种护理方法的应用效果。结果常规护理组患者的护理满意率为78.57%,不良症状发生率为28.57%,住院时间为(8.43±1.57)d,护理效果评分为(88.46±6.52)分;循证护理组分别为96.43%、7.14%、(15.22±2.55)d,护理效果评分为(77.16±3.47)分。循证护理组患者上述各指标均优于常规护理组患者(P<0.05)。结论对子宫切口妊娠患者开展循证护理可以取得令人满意的护理效果。Objective To explore and analyze the clinical effect of evidence-based nursing for patients with uterine incision pregnancy.Methods Fiftysix cases of uterine incision pregnancy in our hospital were selected and divided into groups.There were 28 cases in routine nursing group and 28 cases in evidence-based nursing group,respectively implement routine nursing and evidence-based nursing to intervene.To compare the effect of two nursing methods.Results The nursing satisfaction rate of patients in the routine nursing group was 78.57%,the incidence of adverse symptoms was 28.57%,the hospitalization time was(8.43±1.57)days,and the nursing effect score was(88.46±6.52)points;the evidence-based nursing group was 96.43%,7.14%,(15.22±2.55)d,the nursing effect score was(77.16±3.47)points.The above indicators in the evidence-based nursing group were better than those in the conventional nursing group(P<0.05).Conclusion Evidence-based nursing for pregnancy patients with uterine incision can achieve satisfactory nursing effect.

关 键 词：子宫切口妊娠 循证护理 护理效果 住院时间 不良症状 

分 类 号：R473.71[医药卫生—护理学] R719.8[医药卫生—临床医学]