检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏斐然 SU Feiran(School of Marxism,Chuxiong Normal University,Chuxiong,Yunnan Province 675000)
机构地区:[1]楚雄师范学院马克思主义学院,云南楚雄675000
出 处:《楚雄师范学院学报》2021年第5期45-51,共7页Journal of Chuxiong Normal University
基 金:教育部人文社科研究规划基金西部和边疆地区项目“西南少数民族纠纷解决机制的法治化研究”(17XJA850002)。
摘 要:随着西南地区以市场化、城市化为主要特征的社会变迁的加剧,西南少数民族调解机制与依法治国战略之间的不适应日益凸显,西南少数民族调解机制的创新和法治化改造势在必行。应该辩证分析西南少数民族调解机制的合理性与矛盾性,对西南少数民族习惯法进行甄别和分析,找到与国家法律的更多结合点,推进西南少数民族传统调解机制的法治化改造,构建适应新时代西南民族地区社会治理需要的多元化纠纷解决机制。As social changes in southwest China characterized by marketization and urbanization intensify,the tension between the dispute-settling mechanism of the minority ethnic groups and the strategy of rule of law becomes increasingly obvious.It is imperative that such mechanism be innovated and legalized.When analyzing the rationality of and the contradiction within the dispute-settling mechanism of the minority ethnic groups,a dialectical attitude is desirable.Common practices of the above mentioned ethnic groups should be analyzed and discriminated to identify more aspects in agreement with the laws of the State,so as to promote legalization of the aforesaid mechanism and construct a diversified dispute-settling mechanism to suit the needs of social governance of southwest China in the New Era.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40