检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:章程 Zhang Cheng(Guanghua Law School of Zhejiang University)
机构地区:[1]浙江大學光華法學院
出 处:《中国法律(中英文版)》2021年第3期39-45,119-126,共15页China Law
摘 要:民法學界關於公權力對法律行為效力作用的討論長期限定於違反強制性規範.行政法學界也較少關注私法交易秩序中的行政法制,兩者共同導致了行政行為對法律行為效力的作用問題長久被學界忽視:從憲法自由權的客觀法秩序實現與自由權的法律限制出發,可將行政活動二分,前者以行政確認與私法形成性行政決定對應法律行為一般生效要件,後者以行政許可與命令性行政決定對應特別生效要件與阻卻生效要件.據此即可構築起行政行為對法律行為效力作用的完整體系.The discussion on the effect of public power on the effectiveness of legal acts in the civil law community has long been limited to the breach of peremptory norms,while the administrative law community has paid little attention to the administrative legal system in the private-law transaction order,which have jointly led to the long-term neglect of the role of administrative acts on the effectiveness of legal acts.Administrative activities can be dichotomized in terms of the realization of the objective-law order of the constitutional right to freedom and the legal constraints on the right to freedom:In some administrative activities,administrative confirmation and private-law formative administrative decisions correspond to the general effective essentials of legal acts,and in other activities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38