礼法之争是简单的道德与法律之争吗?  

Is the Controversy between Ritual and Law a Dispute between Morality and Law?

作　　者：文扬 Wen Yang(Institute of Legal History,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法律史学研究院,北京100088

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2021年第5期156-166,共11页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：在清末新刑律制定过程中,针对“无夫奸”是否入刑,礼教派与法理派相持不下,牵引出法律与道德关系的争论。走进清末“西潮又东风”的历史情境,法律与道德发生着深刻的语义变化,双方的争论蕴积着古与今、中与西的时空错置。礼教派因循中学旧识,持守理学视域下的德刑观,强调“刑律本于礼教”、失礼则入刑;法理派援引西学新知,接受了伦理学视域下的道德观,区别个人道德与社会道德,并以“伤害原则”作为法律制裁的依据。随着礼的隐退和伦理学学科的建立,德礼与刑罚本用、主辅、合一的关系,最终转向法律与道德对等、互补、分离的关系。During the law amendment in the late Qing Dynasty,there was an acute controversy between the jurists and the sectarians on the relationship between law and morality surrounding the question whether the“wufujian”clause should be written into the law.Entering the historical situation of“the west tide and the east wind”in the late Qing Dynasty,there are profound semantic changes in law and morality,and the debate between the two sides contains a spatio-temporal mismatch between the ancient and the present,China and the west.The sectarians followed the traditional Chinese learning and adhered to the moral viewpoint of neo-confucianism,emphasized that law is based on ritual and that a breach of ritual is punishable by law.Meanwhile,the jurists invoked modern Western learning and adopted the moral viewpoint of ethics,distinguished between individual morality and social morality and used the“Non-interference Principle”.With the receding of ritual and the establishment of the discipline of ethics,the close relationship in which punishment is attached to and complementary to virtue eventually shifted to an independent relationship in which law is equal to and complementary to morality.

关 键 词：清末修律 礼法之争 道德 伦理学 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]