刑法介入网络信息治理的背景、路径与边界  

The Background, Path and Boundary of Criminal Law Intervening in Network Information Governance

作　　者：冯建华[1] Feng Jianhua(Social Sciences in China Press)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学杂志社,北京100026

出　　处：《新闻界》2021年第9期65-74,共10页Journalism and Mass Communication

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“全媒体时代公共传播治理的理论创新研究”(20BXW079)。

摘　　要：随着网络违法信息不断滋长蔓延,刑法介入网络信息治理在特定情况下不仅实有必要,而且成为迫切之需。刑法介入网络信息治理是网络犯罪性质演变与风险刑法观兴起交相作用的结果,从深层动因来看是因应网络空间传播变革带来的巨大压力,与网络治理模式及其背后的权力机制亦有内在关联。从治理重心和发展趋向来看,刑法介入网络信息治理将从内容规制转向平台规制。在内容规制方面,网络空间诽谤罪与寻衅滋事罪的构成要件以及关于"情节严重"和自诉转公诉的适用规定,至今仍是核心争议焦点;在平台规制方面,如何基于类型化的角色功能,合理设置网络服务提供者的权责结构,是网络空间刑事立法和司法的重点与难点。从制度层面分析,要防止刑法过度介入网络信息治理,关键在于回归传统刑法观,为此需处理好网络空间公权和私权的比例关系,探索构建相互依托和相互制约的网络空间权力格局。With the continuous growth and spread of illegal information on the Internet, criminal law intervention in network information governance is not only necessary under certain circumstances, but also an urgent need. It is the result of the interaction between the evolution of the nature of cyber crimes and the rise of risk criminal law. From the perspective of deep motivation, it responds to the huge pressure brought by the transformation of cyberspace communication. It is also related to the network governance model and the power mechanism behind it. From the perspective of governance focus and development trend, the involvement of criminal law in network information governance will shift from content regulation to platform regulation. To prevent criminal law from overly intervening in network information governance, the key is to return to the traditional criminal law view. To this end, it is necessary to properly handle the proportional relationship between public and private rights in cyberspace, and explore the construction of a mutually dependent and restrictive cyberspace power structure.

关 键 词：网络信息治理 风险刑法 网络诽谤 寻衅滋事 网络秩序 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学]