检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕艳滨[1] Lv Yanbin
出 处:《探索与争鸣》2021年第8期97-104,179,共9页Exploration and Free Views
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“优化营商环境的法治构建”(21ZDA051);中国社会科学院法学研究所“国家法治指数”创新工程项目。
摘 要:法治评估对法治发展具有参与、监督、检验、规范、指引等作用,是新时期推动法治中国建设的重要动力。但实践中,对于何为适格的评估主体,不同主体存在不同认识;不少评估在指标选定上随意性大、严谨性不足,导致指标设计偏差较大,难以发挥客观评价的作用;有的评估则存在方法选用不科学、过度依赖满意度调查的问题,导致结果不客观、不准确。这些问题都会影响法治评估的健康发展,因此,应当为科研院所开展第三方法治评估提供较好的支持与环境,加大对法治评估的理论研究;探索构建科学的评估指标体系,注重指标与法治的关联度以及指标之间的相互关系,发挥指标的评价与引导作用;综合采取客观评价为主、主观评价为辅的方法,提升评估结论的可靠性。The assessment of the rule of law, which has the functions of participation, supervision, verification, regulation and guidance, is an important aspect promoting the development of the rule of law in the new era, and plays a huge role in advancing the modernization of the state governance system and capability. In practice, however, there are different understandings of what is a qualified assessment subject;in many assessments, the randomness and lack of rigor in the selection of indicators have resulted in large deviations in the design of indicators, which affect the objectiveness of the assessment;and in some other assessments, the problems of unscientific selection of methods and over-reliance on satisfaction surveys have led to unobjective and inaccurate assessment results. To prevent these risks, China should provide a better support and environment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222