代表性成果的有效评估——基于诺奖论文  

Evaluation of Representative Papers: Based on Nobel Prize Papers

作　　者：李芙蓉 丁佐奇 Li Furong;Ding Zuoqi(School of Science,China Pharmaceutical University,Nanjing 210009,China;Editorial Department of Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines,China Pharmaceutical University,Nanjing 210009,China)

机构地区：[1]中国药科大学理学院,南京210009 [2]《中国天然药物》编辑部,南京210009

出　　处：《科学观察》2021年第4期40-52,共13页Science Focus

基　　金：2021年度江苏省社科应用研究精品工程人才发展专项课题(21SRB-17)。

摘　　要：该文从文献计量角度分析诺贝尔生理学或医学奖获奖论文,探究国际医学领域代表性成果的特征,通过引入施引文献指标进行补充评估,为代表作的选取提供思路。利用Web of Science数据库和InC ites数据库,统计分析获奖论文的各项指标数据,对于未达到期待被引频次的获奖论文,通过引入TOPCM指标,将其定义为低被引频次但具影响力的出版物。研究发现,大部分诺奖论文发表在高影响因子期刊上,引用半衰期长,被引频次高,绝大部分获奖论文CNCI值高。被引频次不足的诺奖论文其TOPCM值较高,施引文献CNCI值与高被引诺奖论文没有显著差异。建议在筛选代表作时应考虑期刊来源,区分顶级期刊和普通SCI期刊,CNCI值可用作代表作选取的重要指标。增加论文的施引文献引文指标,可以有效地弥补代表作论文选取时只依靠引用指标的局限性。另外,考虑到出版周期等原因,代表作的评价应采取定量与定性相结合的方法。This paper aims to analyze Nobel Prize-winning papers in Physiology or Medicine from the perspective of bibliometrics and explore the characteristics of representative papers. We introduced the citing papers indicators for supplementary evaluation. The key indicators were seclected to provide reference for the selection of representative papers. We searched the Nobel Prize-winning papers in Physiology or Medicine from Web of Science database and Incites database. For the winning papers that did not reach the expected number of citation, a new index TOPCM was introduced to define them as influential publications with low citation. Most of the Nobel Prize-winning papers were published in high-impact factor journals with long half-life and high citation, and most of the winning papers had high CNCI value. The TOPCM value were mostly high for the winning papers with insufficient citation. There was no significant difference in CNCI value of citing papers between the different citations of the winning papers. Representative papers selection considering source journals should distinguish between top journals and ordinary SCI journals. CNCI values can be used as an important indicator for representative selection. Adding citation indicator of citing papers can effectively supplement the limitation of citation indictor for representative papers selection. Considering the publication cycle and other reasons, the evaluation of representative works should adopt a combination of quantitative and qualitative method.

关 键 词：诺奖论文 文献计量 被引频次 CNCI 引用半衰期 施引文献 代表作制度 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学] R2-03[医药卫生—中医学]