中国区域制造业高质量发展测度分析  

Research on Evaluating High-quality Industrial Development at Regional Level in China

作　　者：曲立 王璐[2] 季桓永 Qu Li;Wang Lu;Ji Huanyong(School of Economics and Management,Beijing Information Science and Technology University;China Association for Quality)

机构地区：[1]北京信息科技大学经济管理学院 [2]中国质量协会

出　　处：《数量经济技术经济研究》2021年第9期45-61,共17页Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics

基　　金：国家自然科学基金青年项目“企业最优区分信号对新兴技术扩散的影响机制及政策效应研究”(72102020);北京市社会科学基金项目“基于知识创新的北京高新技术园区价值网络共创机制研究”(19JDGLB019);北京信息科技大学促进高校分类发展-重点研究培育项目“多源异构网络视阈下新兴技术扩散影响机制研究”(2021YJPY227)的资助。

摘　　要：研究目标:明晰我国制造业高质量发展内涵,测度2011~2020年我国区域制造业高质量发展水平。研究方法:综合运用文献研究法、模型分析法、描述性统计和泰尔指数等方法,解析我国区域制造业高质量发展特征及差距。研究发现:我国区域制造业高质量发展水平总体呈稳步提升态势,四大板块、五大经济带的制造业高质量发展水平存在明显差别,地区内差异是造成区域总体差异的主要原因。研究创新:基于新发展理念,从创新、绿色、开放、共享、高效和风险控制六个维度系统构建我国区域制造业高质量发展指数。研究价值:丰富和完善制造业高质量发展测度体系,为推进我国制造业高质量发展提供政策参考。Research Objectives:Constructing measurements for regional high-quality industrial development based on the new development philosophy.Research Methods:Employing literature review,model analysis,descriptive statistical analysis,and Theil index to analyze regional high-quality industrial development in China.Research Findings:The index of regional high-quality industrial development has been growing over the years,and there are significant differences among four plates and five economic belts,intraregional differences are the main reasons for the overall regional differences.Research Innovations:Establishing the index of regional high-quality industrial development at the regional level from six dimensions,including innovation,green,openness,sharing,efficiency and risk control based on new development philosophy.Research Value:Enriching our understanding on evaluating high-quality industrial development and providing recommendations for policy-makers.

关 键 词：新发展理念 高质量发展 制造业 测度体系 

分 类 号：F124[经济管理—世界经济]