假想防卫过当的疑难辨析  

Analysis on the Difficulties of Hypothetical Over-Defense

作　　者：徐胡威 XU Huwei(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200050

出　　处：《商丘职业技术学院学报》2021年第4期14-18,共5页JOURNAL OF SHANGQIU POLYTECHNIC

摘　　要：假想防卫过当处于假想防卫与防卫过当的交叉地带,具有较大的理论价值与实践意义。假想防卫过当存在两个疑点。其一,关于假想防卫过当的罪过形式,存在故意说、过失说以及二分说的分歧,对此应从整体上判断,并且分情形予以具体认定。其二,关于假想防卫过当能否适用《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十条第二款,存在肯定说与否定说的理论争议,对此应当探求规范目的,根据责任减少说认可对该条款的准用予以刑罚减免,同时需要对准用进行一定程度的限制,避免罪刑不相适应。Hypothetical over-defense is at the intersection of hypothetical defense and over-defense,which has great theoretical value and practical significance.There are two problems with hypothetical over-defense.First,regarding the guilt form of hypothetical over-defense,there are differences of intention,negligence,and dichotomy.This should be judged as a whole and identified in specific situations.Second,there is a theoretical dispute between the affirmation and the negation as to whether the hypothetical defense can be applied to paragraph 2 of Article 20 of the Criminal Law.In this regard,the purpose of the regulation should be explored,and the application of this clause should be approved based on the responsibility reduction theory.Penalty reductions and exemptions need to be restricted to a certain extent to avoid incompatible crimes and punishments.

关 键 词：假想防卫过当 防卫过当 责任减少说 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]