检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林同威 Lin Tongwei
机构地区:[1]南开大学日本研究院
出 处:《国际汉学》2021年第3期133-139,207,共8页International Sinology
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“新编日本史”(项目编号:13ZD106)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:孟子的井田构想作为东亚的一种传统经济思想资源,在日本江户时期儒学研究兴盛与土地矛盾日益凸显的大背景下,又被人们重新提起并引发讨论。当时的日本学者们认为井田是一个行仁政、均贫富的土地公有制度。他们一方面非常推崇与之相关的经济理念,另一方面在实际田制改革的计划中又对“复井田”方案进行了否定。这在某种意义上为后来日本开展资本主义的土地制度改革扫除了思想上的部分障碍。As a traditional resource of economic thought in East Asia,Mencius’conception of Well-Field was mentioned again and again.It led to new discussions in the context of thriving Confucian studies and increasingly prominent land contradictions in early modern Japan.From the perspectives of the Japanese scholars at that time,the Well-Field system was believed to be an effective way for a benevolent government.Public land should not be traded and the idea of equal distribution was also emphasized.But,on the other hand,these Japanese scholars were against the implementation of reconstructing the Well-Field system as an actual reform plan.In a sense,these discussions had swept away some ideological barriers for the subsequent,capitalist land-system reform in Japan.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28