从学理视角看FTC诉高通反垄断案件  

Theoretical Analysis of the Case of FTC v.Qualcomm

作　　者：宁立志[1,2] 龚涛 NING Lizhi;GONG Tao

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院 [2]武汉大学知识产权与竞争法研究所

出　　处：《武大国际法评论》2021年第4期119-138,共20页Wuhan University International Law Review

摘　　要：FTC诉高通案引起了美国政府部门之间的巨大分歧,FTC力求对高通进行反垄断处罚以维护竞争秩序和消费者利益,司法部等部门则以国家安全为由力保高通,虽然一审地区法院支持了FTC,但二审上诉法院支持了司法部和高通公司。该案横跨专利法、反垄断法、合同法等多个法律部门,涉及专利权用尽、搭售、独家交易、拒绝交易等法律问题,其结果深刻影响着全球无线通信领域的格局,并与我国相关企业利益攸关。因此,有必要对该案进行学理上的分析,为我国标准必要专利反垄断案件的审理提供思路,尤其是如何对待"无许可—无芯片"政策,如何处理FRAND承诺与反垄断法、合同法的关系等问题。The case of FTC v.Qualcomm has caused great differences among American government departments.FTC strives to impose antitrust penalties on Qualcomm to maintain competition order and consumer interests,while the Department of Justice and other departments strive to protect Qualcomm on the grounds of national security.Although the District Court upheld FTC in the first instance,the Court of Appeal upheld the Department of Justice and Qualcomm in the second instance.The case spans many legal departments such as patent law,antitrust law and contract law,and involves legal issues such as patent exhaustion,tying,exclusive transaction,refusal of transaction and so on.The result has a profound impact on the pattern of the global wireless communication field,and has a bearing on the interests of relevant enterprises in China.It is necessary to make a theoretical analysis of the case in order to provide ideas for the trial of standard essential patent antitrust cases in China,especially how to deal with the policy of"no license-no chip"and how to deal with the relationship between FRAND commitment,antitrust law and contract law.

关 键 词：反垄断法 专利法 标准必要专利 FRAND承诺 国家安全 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]