检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方振武 韦路[2] Fang Zhenwu;Wei Lu
机构地区:[1]南昌大学新闻与传播学院 [2]浙江大学传媒与国际文化学院
出 处:《新闻与传播研究》2021年第8期41-57,126,127,共19页Journalism & Communication
基 金:国家哲学社会科学基金重大项目“媒介体制与社会信任研究”(项目编号:19ZDA325)的阶段性研究成果之一。
摘 要:传播学有关媒介与社会信任之关系的研究,发轫于20世纪80年代初期,但现有的成果多是微观层面的视角,从宏观层面观照媒介体制如何影响社会信任的研究成果不多。首先,鉴于现有比较媒介体制分析框架尚有不足,作者通过文献梳理对其进行了优化,并利用可获得的数据对所有媒介体制维度进行了量化操作,进而提出了一个新的比较媒介体制分析框架。其次,我们考察了该分析框架的媒介体制特征对社会信任可能存在的影响,发现公共媒介的市场份额越大、新闻从业人员对新闻专业主义的认同度越高,社会信任情况越好。媒介市场结构的集中化虽然也有益于社会信任,但仅限于某一特定阈值范围内。不过,这些发现尚待收集更多时间序列数据来证实其稳定性。Studies on the relationship between media and social trust in the communication field began from early1980 s.Many of them were conducted from micro-level perspectives,while researches on howmedia systems affect social trust from macro-level perspectives are few.First,as there are flaws in existing analysis frameworks on comparative media systems,we try to improve them by reviewing literature and come up with a newanalysis framework by operationalizing all possible dimensions of media systems with available data.Second,we use this analysis framework to test howmedia systems would affect social trust and find that the greater the market share of public media and the higher the recognition degree of journalists to journalism professionalism,the better the social trust.Although the centralization of media market structures is also beneficial to social trust,the effect is only limited to a certain range.However,more time-series data are yet to be collected to confirm the stability of these findings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7