王若虚与元好问论诗绝句比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Wang Ruoxu and Yuan Haowen on Quatrains

作　　者：朱彦霖 ZHU Yanlin(Literary Department,Wu Han University,Wuhan 430000,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院,湖北武汉430000

出　　处：《忻州师范学院学报》2021年第4期32-39,61,共9页Journal of Xinzhou Teachers University

摘　　要：王若虚、元好问同为金代文学家,二人不仅创作了优秀的诗文作品,对于各自的诗学观念也有精辟的阐发。文章从论诗诗入手,对二人的诗学观进行比较研究。从创作动机上看,王、元二人的论诗绝句都是时代环境诱发而进行的创作;从文学观念上看,二人对于苏轼及江西诗派的态度较为一致,对黄庭坚的态度则有所差别;从写作手法上看,王、元二人的作品中均采用设问、对比、衬托、比喻、用典的手法,技法多样,但元好问使用各类技法的频率更高。整体来看,王若虚的论诗绝句有争辩的意味,态度更加鲜明强烈,而元好问的论诗作品态度更加理性客观,对后世的影响更大。Wang Ruoxu and Yuan Haowen were both writers of Jin Dynasty.They not only created excellent poems, but also expounded their respective poetic ideas.This paper starts with the discussion of poetry and makes a comparative study of their quatrains on poetry.From the perspective of creative motivation, Wang and Yuan’s quatrains on poetry were all created by the environment of the times;From the point of view of literary concept, they have the same attitude towards Su Shi and Jiangxi Poetic Faction, but different attitude towards Huang Tingjian;From the perspective of writing techniques, Wang and Yuan both used the techniques of question setting, contrast, foil, metaphor and allusion in their works, with various techniques, but Yuan Haowen used all kinds of techniques more frequently.In a word, Wang Ruoxu’s quatrains on poetry are more argumentative, and his attitude is more distinct and strong, while Yuan Haowen’s quatrains on poetry are more rational and objective, and his work has a greater impact on later generations.

关 键 词：王若虚 元好问 论诗绝句 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]