机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属闽东医院骨四区,福建福安355000
出 处:《糖尿病新世界》2021年第15期117-120,共4页Diabetes New World Magazine
摘 要:目的分析2型糖尿病并发骨质疏松患者行护理评分制对DKT、OKT的影响。方法选取该院2018年1月-2019年12月收治的2型糖尿病并发骨质疏松患者86例为该次研究对象。遵循数字随机法将86例患者分组为参照组、研究组,参照组开展常规护理模式干预,研究组则应用护理评分制开展护理干预。对比两组2型糖尿病并发骨质疏松患者治疗后骨质疏松症知识测试问卷(OKT)、糖尿病知识测试问卷(DKT)评分及糖尿病自我管理能力、血糖及骨代谢指标情况。结果研究组患者OKT总分(20.16±1.35)分高于参照组(15.36±1.65)分,差异有统计学意义(t=14.764,P<0.001),DKT评分(20.36±3.24)分高于参照组(15.21±3.12)分,差异有统计学意义(t=7.508,P<0.001),SDSCA总分(24.36±2.15)分高于参照组(19.41±1.53)分,差异有统计学意义(t=12.301,P<0.001),HbAlc值(6.03±0.81)%低于参照组(6.91±0.87)%,差异有统计学意义(t=4.855,P<0.001),FPG值(6.22±1.13)mmol/L低于参照组(7.03±1.35)mmol/L,差异有统计学意义(t=3.017,P<0.001),2 hPG值(8.13±1.65)mmol/L低于参照组(10.06±1.87)mmol/L,差异有统计学意义(t=5.075,P<0.001),BGP值(9.12±1.53)μg/L高于参照组(7.82±1.67)μg/L,差异有统计学意义(t=3.764,P<0.001),BALP值(58.63±10.16)U/L高于参照组(47.65±10.35)U/L,差异有统计学意义(t=4.964,P<0.001)。结论应用护理评分制对2型糖尿病并发骨质疏松患者开展护理干预,对改善其DKT、OKT水平以及糖尿病自我管理能力有显著效果,同时可有效改善患者血糖及骨代谢指标水平,效果显著。Objective To analyze the impact of nursing scoring system on DKT and OKT in patients with type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis.Methods A total of 86 patients with type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis who were admitted to this hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected as the study subjects.Following the numerical randomization method,86 patients were divided into reference group and study group.The reference group carried out routine nursing intervention,and the study group applied nursing scoring system to carry out nursing intervention.The scores of the Osteoporosis Knowledge Test Questionnaire(OKT),Diabetes Knowledge Test Questionnaire(DKT)and diabetes self-management ability,blood glucose and bone metabolism index were compared between the two groups of patients with type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis after treatment.Results The total OKT score(20.16±1.35)points of the study group was higher than the reference group(15.36±1.65)points,the differences was statistically significant(t=14.764,P<0.001),and the DKT score(20.36±3.24)points was higher than the reference group(15.21±3.12)points,the differences was statistically significant(t=7.508,P<0.001),the total score of SDSCA(24.36±2.15)points was higher than that of the reference group(19.41±1.53)points,the differences was statistically significant(t=12.301,P<0.001),Hb Alc value(6.03±0.81)%was lower than the reference group(6.91±0.87)%,the differences was statistically significant(t=4.855,P<0.001),and the FPG value(6.22±1.13)mmol/L was lower than the reference group(7.03±1.35)mmol/L,the differences was statistically significant(t=3.017,P<0.001),the 2 h PG value(8.13±1.65)mmol/L was lower than the reference group(10.06±1.87)mmol/L,the differences was statistically significant(t=5.075,P<0.001),the BGP value(9.12±1.53)μg/L was higher than the reference group(7.82±1.67)μg/L,the differences was statistically significant(t=3.764,P<0.001),BALP value(58.63±10.16)μ/L was higher than the reference group(47.65±10.35)U/L,the differences was statistica
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...