论政府信息公开制度下的个人隐私之保护  

Protection of Individual Privacy in the Government Information Disclosure System

作　　者：王东伟 WANG Dongwei

机构地区：[1]江汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430056

出　　处：《江汉大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第5期5-13,125,共10页Journal of Jianghan University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“基于行政裁判文书的‘明显不当’行政行为研究”(21YJA820022)。

摘　　要：2019年修订的《政府信息公开条例》第15条规定涉及个人隐私的政府信息公开会对第三方合法权益造成损害的,行政机关不得公开,但第三方同意公开,或行政机关进行利益衡量后认为需要公开的,可以公开。然而,从实施现状看,该制度存在不确定的个人隐私概念导致对类似信息的定性不同、行政机关在涉及个人隐私的政府信息公开中怠于行使裁量权、征求权利人同意的程序不明确等问题。结合司法实践中法院认定个人隐私的方法及该规定在适用中存在的问题,完善政府信息公开中个人隐私保护制度应当明确个人隐私的判断方法,规范政府信息公开案件中行政机关的裁量行为,法院在判决时也应当选择有利于解决行政争议的判决类型。Article 15 of the 2019 edition of the PRC Government Information Disclosure Bill stipulates that if the disclosure of government information that involves individual privacy will impair the legitimate right and interest of the third party,the administrative body shall not publicize the information;but with the agreement of the third party,or if the administrative body considers it necessary to publicize it after balancing the interests,the information can be publicized.Whereas,three problems have emerged in the process of enforcing the bill:the indeterminacy in the concept of individual privacy results in the difference of determining the quality of relevant information;in individual privacy related government information disclosure,administrative organs are slack to exercise the discretionary power;and the procedure of seeking the right holder’s consent is undefined.In consideration of the method that the court adopts to ascertain individual privacy in the judicial practice and the problems existing in applying the bill,the individual privacy protection system in improving government information publicity should clearly define the judgment method,standardize the behavior of administrative body in a case of government information disclosure,and choose a type of sentence that is favorable for resolving the administrative dispute when a court is making the verdict.

关 键 词：政府信息 个人隐私 利益衡量 

分 类 号：D913.7[政治法律—民商法学]