检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周泉根[1] ZHOU Quan-gen(Institute of Traditional Culture,Hainan Normal University,Haikou 571100,China)
出 处:《昭通学院学报》2021年第4期8-14,共7页Journal of Zhaotong University
摘 要:孔子“从心所欲不逾矩”、康德“道德律令”,均是中西先贤各自对自由的最当揭陈,中国哲学中的自由本来义归于道德、关键在践履,所谓“知行合一”,是实践之学、德性之学,不涉“纯粹理性”“真假之知”,斯乃中西道学之根本分际,却在康德和孔子各自学问最高处的实践理性领域妙合无垠:悠游于德性之自然,逍遥乎中道之自由。This paper discusses the concept of common practice rationality between China and the West.We can neither clearly reveal the connotation,boundary or evolution of freedom from the perspective of word archaeology,nor confirm the absolute connotation of freedom in the history of philosophy.By comparing the theories of Confucius and Kant,freedom without historical conditions,or individual freedom,lies in self selection and responsibility.The ultimate goal of commandments is not to besiege life,but to balance desire and commandment,emotion and reason,nature and ideal.In a word,freedom in Chinese philosophy originally belongs to the study of practice and virtue,which is perfectly compatible with Kant's philosophy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222