立法授权与行政规范性文件的司法审查强度  

Analysis on the Logical Connection Between Legislative Delegation and the Scope of Judicial Review

作　　者：张雪城 ZHANG Xue-cheng(School of Law,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《湖北工业职业技术学院学报》2021年第4期32-37,共6页Journal of Hubei Industrial Polytechnic

摘　　要：法院对行政规范性文件的审查强度如何,本质系司法与行政之间的分权问题。凯尔森的分权理论框架下,法院天然应对立法机关的判断予以尊让,而面对同为立法执行者的行政机关,法院的尊让则是附条件的。存在立法授权的情形下,行政规范性文件同时反映了立法机关与行政机关的判断,对此法院应如何把握审查强度是一个较为复杂的问题。现行《行政诉讼法》下的审查强度标准单一,容易导致法院对存在立法授权的行政规范性文件过度审查或无力审查。为此,有必要根据行政规范性文件取得授权的不同情况,构建一套区分层次的司法审查强度规则体系。The scope and intensity of judicial review are subject to the separation of powers between judicial and administrative branches.Under Kelsen’s theoretical framework,judicial deference to legislators is taken for granted,but judicial deference to administrative agencies is conditional.Where legislative delegation exists,the administrative normative documents represent the intention of legislators and administrative agencies at the same time,making the scope and intensity of judicial review a quite complicated issue.The sole standard under the current Administrative Litigation Law of the PRC is likely to cause excessive or insufficient judicial review.Thus,it is necessary to formulate a multi-hierarchical system of standards in respect of the scope and intensity of judicial review based on the legislative delegation for administrative normative documents.

关 键 词：审查强度 司法尊让 权力分配 立法授权 

分 类 号：D926.1[政治法律—法学]