检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汤瑜 于水[2] TANG Yu;YU Shui(School of Public Policy and Administration,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an,Shaanxi 710049,China;School of Public Administration,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210095,China)
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院,陕西西安710049 [2]南京农业大学公共管理学院,江苏南京210095
出 处:《求实》2021年第5期97-108,112,共13页Truth Seeking
摘 要:项目下乡中的精英俘获不仅包含精英人物对特定资源的占有,还包含精英地区对普通地区项目资源的挤占。精英俘获并不必然来源于制度缺陷或精英作恶,项目分配中的偶然初始选择、自我强化机制和成本收益考量是导致精英俘获的重要原因之一,其中制度隔离发挥了突出作用。这也解释了为何正式制度和国家权力对精英俘获的规训失效。The elite capture in projects going to the countryside includes not only the possession of spe-cific resources by elites,but also the squeezing of project resources in ordinary areas by elite areas.Elite capture does not necessarily come from institutional defects or elite evil.Accidental initial selec-tion,self-reinforcing mechanism and cost-benefit consideration in project allocation are one of the im-portant reasons leading to elite capture.Among them,institutional isolation has played a prominentrole.This also explains why the formal system and state power are ineffective in the discipline of elitecapture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229