检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘东虹[1] Liu Donghong
出 处:《当代修辞学》2021年第5期79-86,共8页Contemporary Rhetoric
摘 要:语用论辩理论的核心是批判性讨论,即通过论证性会话来消除意见分歧。批判性讨论的理想模型发展为语用-辩证模式,具有逻辑上的"合理性"和"有效性",还具有修辞学层面的"实效性"和语用学属性。然而,该模式却存在修辞学和语用学层面的缺陷,如前提和言语行为的局限性、策略操控的模糊性等。因此,该模式需改良以适用于实际对话讨论。首先,该模式中的修辞学属性需进行拓展,采用宏观层面的"认同"概念,中观层面侧重于几种论辩质。其次,语用学属性上不再局限于言语行为,而代之以包容性和解释力更强的"语用行为"。The core of Pragma-Dialectical Theory is critical discussion,which means resolving disagreement via argumentative dialogue.The ideal model of Critical Discussion has been developed into Pragmatic-Dialectic Model which is endowed with not only reasonableness and validness in logic,but also rhetorical effectiveness and pragmatic properties.However,this model has rhetoric and pragmatic inadequacies such as the limitations in premises and speech acts and vagueness in strategic maneuvering.The model henceforth needs improving so as to be applied to actual discussion.First,its rhetorical property can be expanded by taking Burke’s"Identification"at macro level and focusing on Dialectical Substances at the middle level.Second,its pragmatic property should not be restricted to speech acts which can be replaced by more comprehensive"pragmatic acts"that have more explanatory power.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.121