20世纪日本学界的“古代虾夷族群”论争  

Debate on’Ancient Emishi Ethnic Group’in the Japanese Academia in the 20^(th) Century

作　　者：李文明[1] Li Wenming

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院世界历史研究所

出　　处：《世界历史》2021年第4期99-115,163,共18页World History

摘　　要："古代虾夷族群"论争可与"石器时代日本居民"论争、"古代邪马台国"论争并称为20世纪日本学界的三大古史论争。"古代虾夷族群"论争涉及历史学、文献学、考古学、民族学、人类学等多重学科。20世纪初以来,各个学科均有学者热烈地参与讨论,但论争至今仍未真正终结。2001年,在"古代虾夷族群"问题上,工藤雅树提出"超越论争"的倡议。但论争本身的长期无解并不能简单地视为"超越"的理由。只有对"论争"这一学术现象本身进行分析,对各种学说的合理性、矛盾性都有辩证的认识,才能对"论争"有所超越,避免再次回到重复、执拗的"论争"。The debate on’ancient Emishi ethnic group’can be considered as one of the three debates relating to the ancient history in the Japanese academia in the 20th century,together with the respective debates on’Japanese residents in the Stone Age’and’ancient Yamatai-koku’.The debate on’ancient Emishi ethnic group’involves history,philology,archaeology,ethnology,anthropology and other disciplines.Although various disciplines are enthusiastically involved in these three debates,there is still no real end to such debates.In 2001,Masaki Kudo put forward the proposal of’transcending the controversy’regarding the issue of’ancient Emishi ethnic group’.But the argument itself has not been solved for a long time and cannot be simply regarded as the reason for’transcendence’.Only by analysing the academic phenomenon of’debate’itself and having a dialectical understanding of the rationality and contradiction of various’theories’,can it transcend the’debate’and avoid returning to the repetitive and stubborn’debate’.This is also the focus of the discussion of this paper.

关 键 词：古代虾夷 阿依努 倭人 古代虾夷族群论争 历史文献断层 

分 类 号：K093.13[历史地理—历史学]