检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周详[1] Zhou Xiang
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,武汉430073
出 处:《新文科教育研究》2021年第3期20-40,141,共22页NEW LIBERAL ARTS EDUCATION RESEARCH
摘 要:解决“如何才能成功构建中国特色法学知识体系”的生成可能性难题,需要构建一个良好的学术生态环境。好的文化生态环境,可能会培育出一个中国特色法学知识体系。“自然选择与竞争型”文化生态观,主张全面深入学习德日刑法知识体系;而“人工选择与干预型”文化生态观,怀疑“学派之争”,坚决反对移植德日刑法知识话语体系。中国刑法学界经过近20年的实践,已经形成初具规模的各样层次与范畴的学派立场之争,极大带动了刑法学术的繁荣。我们需要紧密结合中国的本土问题与国情,进一步升华这种学派之争,为推动中国特色刑法知识体系的构建创造良好的学术环境。To answer the question of"how to build a system of legal studies with Chinese characteristics",it is necessary to cultivate a sound academic environment.With regard to cultural ecology,the school of"universalism of western studies"generally believes that competition will lead to natural selection,and advocates comprehensive and in-depth study of the German and Japanese systems of criminal legal studies.On the other hand,the school of"Chinese characteristics"generally highlights"human selection and intervention"and doubts the"school of thought",thus opposing the transplantation of the German and Japanese criminal law knowledge discourse system.After nearly 20 years of practice,the Chinese criminal law academia has shaped an environment where schools of various levels and categories contend,which has greatly contributed to the prosperity of criminal law studies.Thus,we should reconsider China's problems with its national conditions to further sublimate this school of contention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.143.110