检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王向阳 邢韵龄 WANG Xiang-yang;XING Yun-ling(School of Public Administration and Politics and Law, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China;Party School of CPC Yibin Municipal Committee, Yibin 644600, Sichuan, China)
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学公共管理学院,四川成都610031 [2]中共宜宾市委党校,四川宜宾644600
出 处:《华南理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第5期118-128,共11页Journal of South China University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“乡村振兴背景下农村‘三治’协同机制研究”(18CZZ037)。
摘 要:当前,如何有效激活利用我国传统农区闲置宅基地已成为社会各界广泛关注的一项重要议题。引入新制度供给理论,基于预期成本、预期收益、改革风险和问题匹配度的多案例比较分析表明:以安徽金寨为典型代表的行政调控型治理模式,改革预期收益较高,却并不能解决传统农区绝大多数村庄的宅基地利用粗放低效问题。以湖北宜城为典型代表的产权再造型治理模式,因传统农区土地市场发育有限,加之居住社会保障属性短时间内无法替代且难以剥离,这一模式同样不能解决传统农区绝大多数村庄中的一般性宅基地闲置问题。以江西余江为典型代表的自主治理型治理模式,改革预期成本较低,但预期收益很高,同时改革风险极低且可控,在最大限度地解决了宅基地利用粗放低效问题的同时,极大地提升了村庄基础设施建设水平和人居环境质量,并最终转化为广大农村居民生活获得感和幸福感。余江模式适用于当前传统农区绝大多数村庄一般情况。At present,how to effectively activate and utilize idle homesteads in traditional agricultural areas of our country has become an important issue of widespread concern from all walks of life.The introduction of the new system supply theory and the comparative analysis of multiple cases based on expected costs,expected benefits,reform risks,and problem matching degree showed that the administrative control governance model represented by Jinzhai in Anhui Province has higher expected benefits from reform,but it does not solve the problem of extensive and inefficient use of homesteads in most villages in traditional agricultural areas.The property right remodeling governance model,which is represented by Yicheng in Hubei Province,cannot solve the general problem of idle homestead in most villages in traditional agricultural areas because of the limited development of land market in traditional agricultural areas and the fact that the property of residential social security cannot be replaced and is difficult to be stripped in a short time.The autonomous governance model represented by Yujiang,Jiangxi Province,has relatively low expected cost of reform,but high expected benefits.At the same time,the reform risk is extremely low and controllable.While solving the problem of extensive and inefficient use of homestead land to the maximum extent,it has greatly improved the level of village infrastructure construction and the quality of living environment,and finally translated into the sense of gain and happiness of rural residents.Therefore,the Yujiang model is suitable for most villages in traditional agricultural areas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49