检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚思宇[1] 武康平[1] YAO Si-yu;WU Kang-ping(School of Economic and Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
出 处:《科学学研究》2021年第9期1621-1631,共11页Studies in Science of Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71973078)。
摘 要:当前我国高校科研人员的专利行为快速增长,如何有效平衡学术研究的公共属性和专利行为的私权属性是高校面临的重要问题。以2008-2017年112所"211"高校及省部级共建高校多专业科研人员的专利行为和学术影响力相关数据构建研究数据库,综合运用负二项回归和二元Logistics回归,实证分析高校科研人员专利行为在"申请-授权"和"授权-交易"两阶段特征对其学术影响力的影响效应。研究表明:高校科研人员的专利申请数量与学术影响力之间存在显著的倒U型关系,随着专利申请数的增加,学术影响力受到的正向影响会增加,当专利申请数达到年均35项左右时,出现负向影响;当高校科研人员采用独占许可进行专利交易时,学术影响力受到的抑制效应显著。为我国高校专利的全过程管理和相关政策制定提供了参考依据。In the era of knowledge economy,universities have become an important source to provide key technical support for the industry to cope with global competition,via such mechanisms as patent licensing agreement.With the increasing patent behavior,universities are facing more pressure from multi capital and commercialization.This phenomenon has aroused extensive discussion among scholars.How do universities balance the public attribute of academic research and the private attribute of patent commercialization?Does university patent behavior hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge and reduce the academic influence of researchers?In the context of the rapid growth of patent behavior in China’s universities,it is necessary to deeply explore the relationship between patent behavior and academic influence to find the balance between commercialization of technology and publicity of academic research,which has important theoretical and practical significance to improve the science and technology evaluation system and innovation efficiency in China.Large numbers of vital empirical studies have been exploring the relationship between academic research and patent commercialization.Nevertheless,the debate over whether patent behavior helps or restricts university researcher’s academic influence has always been an argument.On one hand,some believe that researchers involved in patent behavior can benefit both from the networks of patent and academic,such as research projects are more related to the industry and publications are more likely to be accepted by high quality journals.On another hand,some argue that patent behavior may change researchers’interest by potential commercial value other than academic value,which leads negative effect on the future of scientific research.The existing literatures mainly focus on the stage of patent application,however,less attention has been paid on the effect of patent licensing stage.As we know,the stage of patent is not static,but changes with time.Therefore,there is a great ne
分 类 号:F062.3[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.54.178