检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢艳秋[1] 赵彬[1] 王向阳[1] Lu Yanqiu;Zhao Bin;Wang Xiangyang(School of Management,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2021年第18期140-146,共7页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(71902045);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(18YJA630110)。
摘 要:基于情绪事件理论,利用收集的298份正式调研样本进行实证分析,探究创新失败情境下情绪智力的内部结构关系。结果发现:①创新失败情境下,情绪智力4个维度在发挥作用时存在先后次序;②自我和他人情绪评价、情绪控制对失败学习存在显著正向影响;③情绪控制在两种情绪评价与失败学习关系中起中介作用;④与自我情绪评价相比,他人情绪评价对失败学习的作用效果更佳。研究结论有助于廓清创新失败情境下的情绪智力结构,明晰情绪智力4个维度间的内部关系,打破以往学者对情绪智力这一构念的固化认知,同时也为中国企业创新失败后的情绪管理实践提供参考。Based on affective events theory,this paper attempts to clarify the intrinsic structural relationship emotional intelligence in the context of innovation failure,by using the data from 298 employees as our formal survey samples.Through empirical analysis,the results show that:①There is a sequence of functions between the four dimensions of emotional intelligence.②Self emotional appraisal and others'emotional appraisal has a positive effect on regulation of emotion and learning from failure severally.③Regulation of emotion plays a mediating role in the relationship between two emotional appraisals and learning from failure.④Compared with self emotional appraisal,the effect of others'emotional appraisal on learning from failure gets better result.This study expands the structure of emotional intelligence in the context of innovation failure,clarifies the internal relations among the four dimensions of emotional intelligence,which breaks the previous scholars'fixed cognition of emotional intelligence as a construct,and the results also provide reference for the emotional management practice of employees in China after innovation failure events.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.12