检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴筱菲 朱淑珍[1] 王苏雪 WU Xiao-fei;ZHU Shu-zhen;WANG Su-xue(Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China)
出 处:《运筹与管理》2021年第9期172-179,共8页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(17BJY195);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2232020B-02);中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助项目(CUSF-DH-D-2016062)。
摘 要:以中美贸易战为背景,研究美国股票市场、中国A股市场与香港股票市场的动态溢出效应。运用DAG-SEM模型和信息指数模型的静态和动态分析法测度市场间波动率信息溢出的方向、强度以及动态变化过程。研究发现:在贸易战期间,美股、港股和A股之间的溢出强度均增加。中国内地股市与美国股市呈双向信息溢出,标普500指数与沪深300指数的“方向交替”多于道琼斯与沪深300指数。特别地,贸易战白热化阶段,即2018下半年至2019上半年,中国内地股市对香港股市的信息溢出强于美国股市,成为港股信息溢出的主要传导者。Based on the Sino-US trade war,this paper studies the dynamic spillover effects of the American stock market,the Chinese A-share market and the Hong Kong stock market.The static and dynamic methods of information index model and DAG-SEM model are used to measure the direction,intensity,and dynamic process of information spillover of volatility between markets.It is found that during the trade war,the spillover intensity between the stock markets of the two countries and domestic sub-markets increases.There is a two-way information spillover between the Chinese mainland stock market and the US stock market,and the“direction alternation”between the S&P 500 index and the CSI 300 index is more than the Dow Jones index and the CSI 300 index.In particular,in the white-hot stage of the trade war,that is,from the second half of 2018 to the first half of 2019,the information spillover of the Chinese mainland stock market to the Hong Kong stock market is stronger than that of the American stock market,becoming the main conductor of Hong Kong stock information spillover.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222