RCEP和CPTPP的比较研究与政策建议  

A Comparative Study of RCEP and CPTPP and Policy Suggestions

作　　者：于鹏[1] 廖向临 杜国臣[1] YU Peng;LIAO Xianglin;DU Guochen(Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation;Monash University)

机构地区：[1]商务部国际贸易经济合作研究院 [2]莫纳什大学商学院

出　　处：《国际贸易》2021年第8期27-36,共10页Intertrade

基　　金：北京市发改委课题“外商投资政策分析研究”的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：RCEP和CPTPP是区域贸易协定的典型代表。RCEP可在一定程度上代表我国目前对外开放的最新水平,同时我国也在积极考虑加入CPTPP。文章从涵盖范围和影响力、协定文本内容两大方面对RCEP和CPTPP进行了比较研究。从涵盖范围和影响力看,RCEP在区域经济总量和贸易投资规模等方面均高于CPTPP。从货物贸易、服务贸易和投资、规则以及争端解决等具体领域看,RCEP在对外开放广度和深度方面与CPTPP相比存在一定差距。为进一步强化制度型开放力度,中国要做好RCEP全面生效前的准备工作,加强对CPTPP的对标研究,提升货物贸易自由化、便利化水平,促进服务贸易和投资领域开放创新,在规则领域加快先行先试。RCEP and CPTPP are typical representatives of regional trade agreements.RCEP can represent the latest level of China’s opening up to the outside world to a certain extent.At the same time,China is actively considering joining the CPTPP.This paper makes a comparative study of RCEP and CPTPP from two aspects:coverage and influence,text content.In terms of coverage and influence,RCEP is higher than CPTPP in regional economic aggregate and trade and investment scale.From the specific areas of trade in goods,trade in services and investment,rules and dispute settlement,RCEP has a certain gap in the breadth and depth of opening up compared with CPTPP.In order to further strengthen institutional opening-up,China should make preparations before RCEP comes into full effect,strengthen the benchmarking research on CPTPP,improve the level of trade liberalization and facilitation of goods,promote the opening and innovation of service trade and investment,and speed up the trial in the field of rules.

关 键 词：RCEP CPTPP 制度型开放 比较研究 

分 类 号：F752[经济管理—国际贸易]