市场转型理论哪一些研究结论是可信的?——对市场转型实证研究结果的Meta分析  

Which Research Findings are Credible in the Market Transition Studies? A Meta Analysis of Empirical Studies in Market Transition Field

作　　者：唐斌斌[1] 刘林平[1] TANG Bin-bin;LIU Lin-ping

机构地区：[1]南京大学社会学院

出　　处：《社会学评论》2021年第5期214-235,共22页Sociological Review of China

摘　　要：市场转型是否导致中国社会中政治(权力)资本的经济回报降低、人力资本回报提升以及性别不平等程度缩小,以往不同的实证研究得出的结论有所不同,甚至互相矛盾。本文基于1990年至2018年发表的有关市场转型实证研究的91篇英文文献的回归结果,对相关效应值进行Meta分析发现:总体而言,市场转型并没有使得中国社会的政治(权力)资本回报减少,其效应值随着市场化程度的发展还会增强;人力资本的回报也会随着市场化程度的进展显著增强;市场转型也没有缩小性别收入差距;影响研究结论的主要因素是变量测量、调查区域和研究质量等。上述结论不存在发表偏倚问题,是稳健可靠的。本文在讨论部分对市场转型理论提出了新的问题。Whether the market transition leads to the decrease of political(power) capital return, the increase of human capital return, and the reduction of gender inequality in Chinese society is inconsistent among the previous empirical findings. Based on the regression results of 91 English literature on market transition published from 1990 to 2018, this study conducts a Meta-analysis of the correlation effect sizes. The results show that the market transition does not reduce the return of political(power) capital in Chinese society;its effective size increases along with the development of marketization;the return of human capital also increases significantly with marketization. Moreover, the market transition does not narrow the gender income gap;the crucial factors influencing the differences of observational researches include the variable measurement, the survey site, the research quality and so on. Result of this study is robust and reliable without publication bias. In the discussion of this paper, we put forward some new questions of the market transition theory.

关 键 词：市场转型 政治资本 人力资本 META分析 

分 类 号：F124[经济管理—世界经济] C91-0[社会学]