两宋理学家诗人的多样性诗学渊源及其诗歌取法范式  

On the Diversified Origins of the Poems of Neo-Confucian Poets in the Song Dynasty and Their Paradigms for Reference

作　　者：王培友 Wang Peiyou

机构地区：[1]北京语言大学人文社科学部

出　　处：《中国文化研究》2021年第3期122-132,共11页Chinese Culture Research

基　　金：教育部2018年重大招标课题“中国诗词语言艺术原理及其历史生成机制研究”(18JZD021)的阶段性成果;。

摘　　要：理学家诗作的诗学渊源和诗歌取法范式是多源的。其远源绍自《诗经》《楚辞》、汉乐府、齐梁体等;近取唐代诗人如王昌龄、李白、杜甫、韩愈等人诗作;对王禹偁、欧阳修、梅尧臣、王安石、苏轼、黄庭坚、吕本中、杨万里等人的诗作多有学习。而理学诗逐渐生成的"击壤体""晦翁体""语录体""讲学体""俗体"等,也是理学家所重视的诗歌取法范式。由此而言,以《四库全书提要》为代表的历代目录学著作或诗论等,往往把理学家的诗歌范式追求追溯到"击壤体""讲学体"等,再通过贬低"击壤体""讲学体"等从而行否定理学家诗作及其诗歌史地位之实,这一学理逻辑和学术进路是不严密的。Neo-Confucianists in the Song Dynasty absorbed nutrients from various sources:from literature as far back as Shijing(Book of Odes),Chu Ci(Verses of Chu),yuefu(Music Bureau of Han Dynasty)and Qi Liang style,to the works of poets in the Tang Dynasty like Wang Changling,Li Bai,Du Fu and Han Yu.Poems composed in the Song Dynasty like those of Wang Yucheng,Ouyang Xiu,Mei Yaochen,Wang Anshi,Su Shi,Huang Tingjian,LüBenzhong,Yang Wanli,as well as ji rang(throwing clods)style,Hui Weng style,jiang xue(teaching)style and su(demotic)style writings were also valued by Neo-Confucianists as paradigms for reference.However,standard works of traditional Chinese bibliography represented by Siku Quanshu Zongmu Tiyao(Annotated Catalog of the Complete Imperial Library)only traced the paradigms of Neo-Confucianists’poems back to sources like Ji rang style or jiang xue style.By denying the value of those writings,they underplayed the importance of Neo-Confucianists’poems.Technically,it’s an imprecise deduction.

关 键 词：两宋 理学家 语言艺术 诗歌范式 

分 类 号：I222[文学—中国文学]