日本战后中国近世思想史研究的滥觞  

The Origin of the Research on the History of Modern Chinese Thoughts in Japan after the World War Ⅱ

作　　者：朱捷 Zhu Jie

机构地区：[1]南京邮电大学 [2]南京大学博士后流动站

出　　处：《中国文化研究》2021年第3期173-180,共8页Chinese Culture Research

基　　金：江苏省社会科学基金项目(19WWC005);南京邮电大学科研启动基金(人文社科类)(NYY219014);2019年度高校哲社科一般项目研究成果(2019SJA0101)的阶段性成果;。

摘　　要：战后日本学者的中国思想史研究具有明显区别于战前的某些特质,这些特质大多在岛田虔次的《中国近代思维的挫折》当中有所呈现,岛田基于此作的中国研究认识论与方法论为战后日本的中国近世思想史研究奠定了一种基调。自岛田起,以广义层面的阳明学作为切入点,进而探讨中国思想的近代性问题,成为日本中国思想史研究领域的主流学术范式,尤其是其对中国思想史研究视角做出的转变,以及基于新视角对中国"近代思维"的探索为战后日本的中国近世思想史研究打下了坚实的基础。本文试图对岛田"挫折"论的思考理路及其对后世相关学者的影响进行细致的考察与论证。The research on the history of Chinese thoughts by Japanese scholars after the World WarⅡhas certain characteristics that are clearly different from those before the war.Most of these characteristics are presented in Shimada Kenji’s Frustration of Modern Chinese Thinking.Based on this work,the epistemology and methodology of Shimada’s Chinese studies laid a tone for the study of modern Chinese thoughts history in post-war Japan.Starting from Shimada,taking the broad-level Yangming studies as the entry point to explore the modernity of Chinese thoughts,it has become the mainstream academic paradigm in the field of research on the history of Chinese thoughts in Japan,especially its transformation of the research perspective on the history of Chinese thoughts,and the exploration of China’s"modern thinking"based on a new perspective laid a solid foundation for the study of modern Chinese thoughts history in post-war Japan.This article attempts to conduct a detailed investigation and demonstration of Shimada’s"frustration"theory and its influence on related scholars in later generations.

关 键 词：日本中国学 岛田虔次 《中国近代思维的挫折》 阳明思想 

分 类 号：K25[历史地理—历史学]