检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙朋 SUN Peng(Faku County Central Hospital,Shenyang City,Liaoning Province,Liaoning Shenyang 110499)
机构地区:[1]辽宁省沈阳市法库县中心医院,辽宁沈阳110499
出 处:《中国医疗器械信息》2021年第17期144-146,共3页China Medical Device Information
摘 要:目的:分析对急性化脓性中耳炎采用吸引器进行治疗的效果。方法:选择在2018年12月~2019年8月到本院进行治疗的76例急性化脓性中耳炎患者,按随机方法分为观察组和对照组,每组平均38例。对照组选择常规手段治疗,观察组采用外耳道高负压吸引治疗,比较不同治疗的效果。结果:观察组治疗有效率高于对照组,并发症发生率低于对照组,P<0.05;经不同治疗后比较两组患者2000Hz、1000Hz、500Hz不同等级的频率的听阀水平,观察组明显优于对照组,P<0.05。结论:临床对急性化脓性中耳炎患者应用外耳道高负压吸引方案进行治疗效果更好。Objective:To analyze the effect of using suction device to treat acute suppurative otitis media.Methods:A total of 76 patients with acute suppurative otitis media who were treated in our hospital from December 2018 to August 2019 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group,with an average of 38 cases in each group.The control group was treated with conventional methods,and the observation group was treated with high negative pressure external ear canal suction treatment to compare the effects of different treatments.Results:The treatment efficiency of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,and the incidence of complications was lower than that of the control group,P<0.05;comparing the levels of auditory valves at different frequencies of 2000Hz,1000Hz,and 500Hz between the two groups of patients after treatment,the observation group was significantly better than the control group,P<0.05.Conclusion:The clinical application of the high negative pressure external ear canal aspiration therapy for patients with acute suppurative otitis media is more effective.
分 类 号:R764.21[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.9.230