电信网络诈骗帮助取款行为刑事责任评价  

Evaluation of Criminal Responsibility of Helping Withdraw Money for Telecom Network Fraud

作　　者：于冲[1] 赵小涵 Yu chong;Zhao Xiaohan

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院

出　　处：《常州大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第5期13-20,共8页Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“网络共同犯罪基本原理及其对传统共犯理论的突破研究”(17CFX023)。

摘　　要：电信网络诈骗帮助取款行为掩盖诈骗行为人身份,使得司法机关调查的难度大大增加,助长了诈骗行为人的犯罪气焰。现阶段电信网络诈骗刑事责任认定仍存在不同程度的同案不同判之现象,司法机关相继出台了一些司法解释,但仍有矛盾和模糊之处。基于理论与实践的双重考量,围绕电信网络诈骗帮助取款行为刑事责任评价要点,对认定既遂标准、事前通谋判定、主观“明知”认定进行探讨。结合承继共犯理论,根据是否存在事前通谋和加入犯罪时的犯罪形态将帮助取款行为划分为三种,结合实践中帮助取款行为刑事责任认定,将帮助取款行为的评价司法类型化,以期一定程度上减少同案不同判现象。The behavior of helping withdraw money for telecom network fraud covers up the identity of the fraud perpetrator,which greatly increases the difficulty of judicial investigation and encourages the criminal arrogance of the fraud perpetrator.At present,there exists the phenomenon of different judgments of criminal responsibility of telecom network fraud of the same case in different degrees.Judicial authorities have issued some judicial interpretations,but there are still contradictions and ambiguities.Based on the consideration of both theory and practice,this paper focuses on the criminal responsibility evaluation points of the behavior of helping withdraw money for telecom network fraud,and discusses the criteria for the identification of accomplishment,the judgment of prior collusion,and the identification of subjective“knowing”.Combining the theory of succession accomplice,the behavior of helping withdraw money is divided into three layers according to whether there is collusion and the crime pattern when joining in the crime.In combination with the determination of criminal responsibility of the behavior of helping withdraw money in practice,the judicial classification of the evaluation of the behavior of helping withdraw money is proposed to reduce the phenomenon of different judgments of the same case to a certain extent.

关 键 词：电信网络诈骗 帮助取款 刑事责任 承继共犯 

分 类 号：D924.35[政治法律—刑法学]