并合主义视域下逃避与追诉时效延长关系重构  

Reconstructing the Relationship Between Evasion and Limitation of Prosecution Based on the Theory of Comprehension

作　　者：周笔峰 ZHOU Bifeng(School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《河南工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2021年第3期41-46,共6页Journal of Henan University of Engineering(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(15CFX024)。

摘　　要：追诉时效是立法者对于可罚性趋零的推定,在可罚性趋零之前的任何时间点立案,都不存在追诉障碍。《刑法》对于追诉时效例外制度的规定并非法律拟制,而是提示性条文。只要在追诉期限内立案,不论犯罪人是否逃避,都应对其无限期追诉。除此之外,对于可罚性趋零的推定可能会因为出现能显著升高可罚性的特定事实而被推翻。基于刑罚的并合理论,特殊预防和一般预防都是刑罚追求的目的,在责任并未清零之前,只要出现增加特殊预防必要性的事实,就可以重新计算时效。The limitation of prosecution is a presumption by the legislator that the punishability is undesired.There is no obstacle to prosecution if the case is opened at any time before the penalty is available.The exception of limitation of prosecution regulated by the Criminal Law of the People′s Republic of China is not the draft but the alert articles.As long as the prosecution procedure with the right of litigation is initiated before the liability is cleared,it should be prosecuted.However,this presumption may be overturned because of specific facts that can significantly increase the penalties.Based on the Theory of Comprehension of Punishment,both special prevention and general prevention are the goals pursued by penalties.Before the liability is cleared,the fact that the need for special prevention is increased can lead to the recalculation of time limitations.

关 键 词：并合主义 逃避 追诉时效延长 后果平衡 

分 类 号：D920.4[政治法律—法学]