民法典视域下非近亲属监护人的知情同意权研究  

Research on Non-close-relative Guardians'Informed Consent from the Perspective of Civil Code

作　　者：王龙 石悦 Wang Long;Shi Yue

机构地区：[1]北京市华卫律师事务所 [2]大连医科大学人文与社会科学学院法学系

出　　处：《医学与法学》2021年第5期103-106,共4页Medicine and Jurisprudence

基　　金：2015年度辽宁省社会科学规划基金重点项目“我省医事行为伦理调整与法律救济”(项目编号:L15AFX001);四川医事卫生法治研究中心青年项目“民法典视域下成年意定监护在医疗领域的适用困境与出路”(项目编号:YF21-Q13)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在《民法典》的监护制度体系中,监护人的范畴还包括被监护人近亲属之外其他愿意担任监护人的个人或组织,然而现行立法关于知情同意权行使主体的规定却较为混乱,如医疗决策时适用的知情同意制度,仅以患者和近亲属为核心构建,缺少非近亲属监护人行使知情同意权的明确规定,致非近亲属监护人行使知情同意权存在障碍。故当以司法解释或指导性案例的形式对《民法典》相关制度予以优化,明确监护人之知情同意权主体的规定,并加强医疗机构对之的监督职责,以保障作为患者的被监护人的利益。In the guardianship system of Civil Code,the category of guardianship is not limited to the guardianship's close relatives,but also includes other individuals or organizations willing to act as guardians.However,the current legislation on the exercise of informed consent subject is confused,e.g:informed consent system applicable to medical decision-making is only constructed with patients and close relatives as the core,it lacks explicit provisions for non-close-relative guardians to exercise the right of informed consent,which results in obstacles for non-close relatives to exercise informed consent.Therefore,the relevant system of Civil Code should be optimized in the form of judicial interpretation or guiding cases,and it should be clarified that guardians have the right to informed consent,and supervision duties of medical institutions should be strengthened to protect the interests of patients under guardianship.

关 键 词：非近亲属监护人 知情同意权 法律冲突 《民法典》 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]