检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡海涛 徐洁[1,2] 景啸 阮印辉 张立 HU Haitao;XU Jie;JING Xiao;RUAN Yinhui;ZHANG Li(Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China;Research Insitute of Geotechnical Engineering,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China;Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute(Group)Co.Ltd.,Shanghai 200092,China;Zhejiang Taizhou Coastal Expressway Co.Ltd.,Taizhou 318000,Zhejiang China;Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital,Nanjing 210029,China)
机构地区:[1]河海大学岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,南京210098 [2]河海大学岩土工程科学研究所,南京210098 [3]上海市政工程设计研究总院(集团)有限公司,上海200092 [4]浙江台州市沿海高速公路有限公司,浙江台州318000 [5]江苏省人民医院,南京210029
出 处:《河南科学》2021年第9期1453-1460,共8页Henan Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金(51708176);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(B200201049);浙江省交通运输厅科研计划项目(2020029)。
摘 要:工程建设和河道清淤等工程的开展导致了大量废弃淤泥土的产生.废弃淤泥土资源化利用最有效的途径之一是对废弃淤泥土进行固化后作为路基或地基填料利用.本研究通过室内试验确定了最优固化剂配比,采用厂拌法、路拌法及就地固化法三种固化工艺将废弃淤泥土固化后在试验路段进行路基填筑,通过钻孔取芯的方法取回原状固化土试样进行浸水崩解试验和干湿循环试验.结果表明:三种固化工艺获得的固化土试样的水稳特性均较好.随着干湿循环次数的增加,厂拌法试样的强度衰减率及质量衰减率均较小;路拌法试样的质量前期发生折损,后期趋于稳定,最大质量衰减率为15.3%,最大强度衰减率为39.6%;就地固化法试样的质量折损最严重,最大质量衰减率为47.0%.通过三种固化工艺获得的固化土试样的抗干湿循环能力从高到低依次为:厂拌法试样>路拌法试样>就地固化法试样.厂拌法试样的无侧限抗压强度比路拌法试样大约一倍,这是因为厂拌法精度更高更均匀.The development of engineering construction and river dredging project has led to the generation of a large number of waste sludge.It is one of the most effective ways to utilize waste sludge as filling material for subgrade or foundation after solidification.The optimal curing agent ratio was determined by laboratory tests in this study.Three solidification processes,namely plant mixing method,road mixing method and in-situ solidification method,were used to solidify the waste sludge and then the subgrade was filled in the experimental section after solidification.The undisturbed solidified soil samples were retrieved by drilling and core-taking method for immersion disintegration test and wetting-drying cycle test.The results show that the water stabilities of the samples prepared by three solidification processes are all quite well.With the increase of wetting-drying cycle numbers,the strength reduction rate and mass reduction rate of samples prepared by the plant mixing method are relatively small.The mass reduction of samples prepared by the road mixing method occurs in the early stage and tends to be stable in the later stage.The maximum mass reduction rate of samples prepared by the road mixing method is 15.3%,and the maximum strength reduction rate is 39.6%.The mass reduction of the samples prepared by the in-situ solidification method is the most serious,with the maximum mass reduction rate of 47.0%.The wetting-drying cycle resistances of the solidified soil samples obtained by the three solidification processes in the order of high to low are as follows:samples of plant mixing method>samples of road mixing method>samples of in-situ solidification method.The unconfined compression strength of the samples prepared by the plant mixing method is about twice that of the samples prepared by the road mixing method,because the plant mixing method is more accurate and uniform.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38