基于熵权TOPSIS法的医院科研评价体系研究  

An entropy-weighted TOPSIS-based approach for managerial evaluation of scientific research in hospitals

作　　者：赵虹[1] 王羿升[1] 高琪佩 苗卫军[1] 龚韩湘 Zhao Hong;Wang Yisheng;Gao Qipei;Miao Weijun;Gong Hanxiang(Department of Scientific Research Management,Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510260,China)

机构地区：[1]广州医科大学附属第二医院科研管理科,广州510260

出　　处：《中华生物医学工程杂志》2021年第4期442-447,共6页Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering

基　　金：广东省医学科研基金项目(B2021099)。

摘　　要：构建医院科研能力评价指标体系,并采用熵权TOPSIS法对医院科研能力进行综合评价。结果显示,权重占比前3位的评价指标分别为专利授权数(0.2368)、技术转让合同金额(0.1141)和技术转让合同数(0.0925);纳入研究的13所医院(分别A1~A13表示)中,A12医院的科研能力最强,科研能力最差的是A4医院,最强与最差的接近程度评分差异相差巨大(约27倍)。本研究客观定量分析了导致医院科研能力差异的关键因素,有助于引导医院不断提升自身的科研能力水平;同时也为卫生行政部门制订相关政策提供参考依据。The purpose of this study was to establish a mangerial evaluation system for scientific research based on entropy-weighted TOPSIS approach that includes evaluation descriptors to comprehensively evaluate the scientific research capability in hospitals.The study showed that the first three evaluation descriptors with highest weights were the number of patent grants(0.2368),total money(0.1141)and number(0.0925)of technology transfer contracts.Among the 13 hospitals included in this study(A1~A13),A12 boosted the strongest capability while A4 appeared weakest in scientific research.A huge difference was apparent in similarity scores between the strongest and the weakest(by nearly 27-fold).This study objectively quantified the critical factors that led to the difference in capabilities of scientific research in hospitals,and would help guide sustained improvement of the scientific research capabilities in these hospitals.Meanwhile,this study also provide methodological evidence for health administration authority in policy-making.

关 键 词：熵权TOPSIS法 医院 科研能力 

分 类 号：R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]