检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵辉[1] 李新 路秀灵 Zhao Hui;Li Xin;Lu Xiuling(Central Hospital of Binzhou City,Shandong Binzhou 251700)
出 处:《中国社区医师》2021年第30期178-179,共2页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:探究不同临床护理干预模式对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的应用效果及对生活质量的影响。方法:2019年11月-2020年10月收治老年COPD患者72例,随机分为两组,各36例。对照组实施常规护理,观察组实施综合护理,比较两组患者肺功能及生活质量改善情况。结果:观察组护理后用力肺活量(FVC)、第1秒用力呼气值(FEV_(1))、FVC/FEV_(1)等肺功能指标水平均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组护理后心理功能、社会功能、物质功能及躯体功能等生活质量评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:老年COPD患者予以综合护理干预,可有效改善患者肺功能及生活质量。Objective:To explore the effect of different clinical nursing intervention modes on the elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)and the impact on the quality of life.Methods:From November 2019 to October 2020,72 elderly COPD patients were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 36 cases in each group.The control group carried out conventional nursing.The observation group carried out comprehensive nursing.The improvement of lung function and quality of life were compared between the two groups.Results:After nursing,FVC,FEV_(1),FVC/FEV_(1) and other lung function indexes in the observation group were higher than the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The psychological function,social function,material function and physical function of the observation group after nursing quality of life scores were higher than the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Comprehensive nursing intervention can effectively improve lung function and quality of life in elderly COPD patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28