公共数据不当使用的竞争法规制路径  

Competition regulatory law path for improper use of public data

作　　者：石吉祥 SHI Ji-xiang(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042 China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学经济法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《新余学院学报》2021年第5期90-95,共6页Journal of Xinyu University

摘　　要：公共数据不正当竞争纠纷第一案——“蚂蚁金服案”引发了对公共数据使用正当性边界及其违法规制路径的广泛探讨,尤其以《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》的类型化条款和一般条款的适用抉择以及一般条款的内部适用逻辑为焦点。通过法条文义解释、立法原意整理、司法审判现状研究,同时结合大数据商业模式的竞争特点,厘清了公共数据不当使用并未落入类型化条款的规制范畴,应当适用一般条款;一般条款的适用需要将《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》第二条第一款商业道德原则和第二款利益衡量标准相结合。The first case of unfair competition dispute over public data,the“Ant Financial Service”case has triggered a wide range of discussion on the boundary of the legitimacy of the use of public data and illegal regulation path,especially it focuses on the choice of the application of the typed provisions and general provisions of The Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People′s Republic of China and the internal application logic of the general provisions.Through the interpretation of the meaning of legal provisions,sorting out the original meaning of legislation and the research on the current situation of judicial trial,and combined with the competitive characteristics of big data business model,it is clarified that the improper use of public data does not fall into the regulation scope of typed provisions,and the general provisions should be applied;the application of the general provisions requires the combination of the principle of business ethics in paragraph 1 of Article 2 of The Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People′s Republic of China with the interest measurement standard in paragraph 2.

关 键 词：公共数据 一般条款 商业道德原则 利益衡量标准 《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]