检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾玉娇[1] 杨佳 JIA Yujiao;YANG Jia
机构地区:[1]吉林大学哲学社会学院
出 处:《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第5期31-38,共8页Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目“乡村振兴内生主体的社会动员机制研究”(19ASH008)。
摘 要:制度的顶层设计与基层实践的关系是社会学、政治学、公共管理学等学科的经典议题,并形成了制度研究中“应然”与“实然”相对立的研究困局。本文以农村社会救助制度的文本形态与实践形态为研究起点,提出事实逻辑这一概念以凝练表达农村社会救助制度实践蕴含的复杂的内在遵从,并通过解析事实逻辑及其得以形成的情境,回应一直以来制度实践研究中中央与地方/基层、应然与实然之间的对立问题。只有进行农村社会救助制度实践情境建设,优化实践情境,才能生成好的事实逻辑,实现文本制度活化于制度实践情境中,并转化为实践制度。The relationship between the top-level design and the grass-roots practice of the system is a classic topic in sociology,political science,public management and other disciplines,and has formed a research dilemma in which the system“should be”and“actually”are opposed to each other in system research.This article takes the text form and practice form of the rural social assistance system as a research starting point,and proposes the concept of factual logic to concisely express the complex internal compliance contained in the practice of the rural social assistance system.By analyzing factual logic and the context that led to them,responding to the opposite problems between central and local/grass-roots,and between“should be”and“actually”in the research of institutional practice,it is concluded that only the construction and the optimization of the practical context of the rural social assistance system can generate good factual logic and realize the activation of the text system in the context of system practice and transform it into a practical system.Accordingly,corresponding countermeasures and suggestions are put forward.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147