检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林妍池 Lin Yanchi
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《南海法学》2021年第5期95-103,共9页The South China Sea Law Journal
基 金:中南财经政法大学2021年度学科统筹项目“关键核心技术创新发展的知识产权支撑体系研究”资助。
摘 要:基于算法程序的个性化推送服务已经成为智能时代下众多网络服务平台的核心运营手段,其在技术层面提升用户体验的同时,也引发了法律层面的责任认定难题。对算法推送的运作机制进行考察,在积极层面上,其"技术中立"之表象难掩"主动推荐"之实质;在消极层面上,算法推送结果出现侵权内容构成网络平台对较高注意义务的违反。为加强对网络平台算法推送行为的规制力度,保障相关主体间的利益平衡,有必要将版权过滤与监控义务引入其注意义务体系,并推进落实算法解释与算法评价相结合的算法透明。The personalized push service based on algorithm program has become the core operation method of network service platforms in the intelligent era.While improving the user experience at the technical level,it also raises the problem of liability determination at the legal level.On the positive level,the appearance of"technological neutrality"cannot conceal the essence of"active recommendation".On the negative level,the infringing content in the results of algorithm push constitutes a violation of higher duty of care.In order to strengthen the regulation of algorithm push behavior and ensure the balance of interests among relevant subjects,it is necessary to introduce copyright filtering and monitoring obligations into the duty of care system,and to promote the implementation of algorithm transparency that combines algorithm interpretation and algorithm evaluation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44