唐开元年间校书撰录史实考述——兼论《群书四录》的性质及体例  

A Study on the Proofreading and Cataloging in Kaiyuan Period of Tang Dynasty--On the Attribute and Style of Qunshusilu

作　　者：康廷山 Kang Tingshan

机构地区：[1]烟台大学人文学院,山东烟台264005

出　　处：《大学图书馆学报》2021年第5期106-112,119,共8页Journal of Academic Libraries

基　　金：山东省社科规划重大项目“日本东洋文库馆藏汉籍调查编目”(编号:20AHBJ06)的研究成果之一。

摘　　要：开元以前唐代内府藏书已分置东、西两京,故褚无量校写四部书分东都乾元殿和西京丽正殿两个阶段,整理对象是两京所藏内府御书及从秘书省等其他机构和民间搜访之异书。而马怀素雠校秘书省藏书是为给褚无量校写御书提供善本,续撰《七志》则是其雠校时主动奏请的,是对自己目录学思想的一次实践。元行冲领撰《群书四录》沿袭了马怀素续《七志》的图书著录范围、“传”的解题名称等,在分类上则采用七分法补充四分法之不足。这也说明当时四分法虽已成为主流,但仍不够完善。Before Kaiyuan period of Tang Dynasty,the imperial collection of Neifu has been stored separately in Chang'an and Luoyang.So Chu Wuliang's work contained two stages:Qianyuan hall in the east capital and Lizheng hall in the west capital.The objects are the imperial books stored in the two capitals and the different books collected from other organizations and the people.Ma huaisu's collation in Mishusheng was to provide rare books for Chu Wuliang's work.The continuation of Qizhi was his active request and also a practice of his bibliography thought.Yuan Xingchong's Qunshusilu followed the description range of Ma huaisu's work and the title Zhuan.In terms of classification,it adopted seven types-method to supplement the deficiency of quarter method.It shows that although the quarter method has become the mainstream,it was still not perfect.

关 键 词：禇无量 马怀素 续《七志》 元行冲 群书四录 

分 类 号：G257[文化科学—图书馆学]