检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁晨[1] 刘紫英[2] LIANG Chen;LIU Ziying(Propaganda Department of Party Committee,Leshan Normal University,Leshan Sichuan 614000,China;School of Foreign Languages,Leshan Normal University,Leshan Sichuan 614000,China)
机构地区:[1]乐山师范学院党委宣传部,四川乐山614000 [2]乐山师范学院外国语学院,四川乐山614000
出 处:《乐山师范学院学报》2021年第9期110-116,共7页Journal of Leshan Normal University
基 金:四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地数字文化与传媒研究基地2021年一般项目“后真相时代事实核查参与网络谣言治理机制的研究”(CDCM202105)。
摘 要:社交媒体超越了距离和时间等物理限制,渗透到社会的方方面面,为人们提供信息的便利。但社交媒体的"回音室效应"(echo chambers)和"过滤泡特性"(filter bubble)给网络谣言形成了绝佳的温床。事实核查的出现虽然不是根除这一隐患的最佳手术,但却是验证信息客观真实的必要环节,并随着信息传播方式的变化而发展。文章介绍了事实核查在日本的发展状况及困境,以日本新冠疫情事实核查数据库为样本分析,试图找出在突发公共卫生事件等重大灾难响应时,日本网络谣言的应对策略。帮助我国设计和构建与国情相适应的事实核查机制,探索一条安全、稳定、高效的网络谣言治理之路。Transcending the physical limitations of distance and time, social media increasingly penetrates into all aspects of society facilitating people’s daily life. However, the "echo chambers" and "filter bubble" of social media have formed an excellent hotbed for internet rumors. Although the appearance of fact checking is not the best operation to eradicate this hidden danger, it is a necessary link to verify the objectivity and authenticity of information, which changes in the way information disseminated. This paper focused on the development status and dilemma of fact checking in Japan, and tried to find out the coping strategies of Japan’s internet rumors in response to major disasters such as public health emergencies based on the sample analysis of fact checking database of Japan’s COVID-19, hoping to help our country design and build a fact-checking mechanism in line with the national conditions, and explore a safe, stable and efficient way to govern internet rumors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15