钢筋混凝土框架结构与框架薄壳结构的抗震性能和CO_(2)排放研究  

Research on Seismic Performance and CO_(2) Emissions of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structure and Frame Shell Structure

作　　者：杨小卫[1] 王浩民 YANG Xiao-wei;WANG Hao-min(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Zhongyuan University of Technology,Zhengzhou 450007,China;Zhengzhou University Multi-functional Design and Research Academy Co.,Ltd.,Zhengzhou 450002,China)

机构地区：[1]中原工学院建筑工程学院,河南郑州450007 [2]郑州大学综合设计研究院有限公司,河南郑州450002

出　　处：《混凝土与水泥制品》2021年第11期68-72,共5页China Concrete and Cement Products

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(51574296);深圳大学结构工程研究所开放研究基金项目(SZURISE:2019-05)。

摘　　要：为了实现抗震性能好且材料节能的结构体系,针对多层办公楼案例,按照我国相关规范设计成钢筋混凝土框架结构和框架薄壳结构,通过弹塑性动力时程分析比较了两种结构体系的抗震性能、材料用量和CO_(2)排放量。结果表明:两种结构体系都能满足“三水准”抗震设防目标;框架结构的最大楼层位移和最大层间位移角比框架薄壳结构大,罕遇地震下框架结构的损伤比框架薄壳结构严重;框架薄壳结构的混凝土、钢筋用量和CO_(2)排放量相比框架结构分别减少了1167.7 t、35.1 t和220 t;框架薄壳结构的抗震性能和节能减排性能明显优于框架结构。In order to achieve a structural system with good seismic performance and materials saving,for the case of a multi-storey office building,a reinforced concrete frame structure and a frame shell structure were designed in accordance with Chinese relevant codes.The seismic performance,material consumption and CO_(2)emission of the two structural systems were compared through elasticplastic dynamic time history analysis.The results show that the two structural systems can meet the"three-level"seismic fortification goal.The maximum floor displacement and maximum interstory displacement angle of the frame structure are larger than those of the frame shell structure,and the damage of frame structure under rare earthquake is more serious than that of frame shell structure.Compared with the frame structure,the amount of concrete,steel bars and CO_(2)emission of the frame shell structure are reduced by 1167.7 t,35.1 t and 220 t respectively.The seismic performance,energy saving and emission reduction performance of frame shell structure are obviously better than those of frame structure.

关 键 词：钢筋混凝土框架结构 钢筋混凝土框架薄壳结构 抗震性能 CO_(2)排放量 材料用量 

分 类 号：TU375.4[建筑科学—结构工程]