检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张雨微[1] ZHANG Yu-wei(School of Economics and Finance,Xi’an Foreign Studies University,Xi’an 710128,China)
机构地区:[1]西安外国语大学经济金融学院,西安710128
出 处:《经济研究导刊》2021年第29期1-4,共4页Economic Research Guide
基 金:陕西省社会科学基金项目“异质性土地约束下陕西承接产业转移与产能过剩风险防控研究”(2019D050)。
摘 要:当前,关于产能过剩成因的研究已拓展到技术进步的视角,围绕着技术创新的不同方向和模式,探究其对产能投资与利用带来的结构性矛盾,形成了大量有价值的理论观点。基于现有文献,归纳出创新强度、创新对象、要素倾向三个方面的解释路径,分别评价了其理论上的优缺点及现实解释力。根据多数研究,中国产能过剩的根源在于渐进式创新、工艺创新、资本偏向型技术进步在技术变迁中的份额过大,导致部分企业对低成本创新形成路径依赖,无法满足消费结构不断升级对新产品新供给的需求。At present,the research on the causes of overcapacity has been extended to the perspective of technological progress.Around the different directions and modes of technological innovation,it has explored the structural contradictions brought by capacity investment and utilization,and formed a large number of valuable theoretical viewpoints.Based on the existing literature,this paper summarizes the interpretation paths of innovation intensity,innovation object and factor tendency,and evaluates their theoretical advantages and disadvantages and practical explanatory power respectively.According to most studies,the root cause of China’s overcapacity lies in the excessive share of incremental innovation,process innovation and capital biased technological progress in technological change,which leads to the path dependence of some enterprises on low-cost innovation and can’t meet the demand for new products and new supply due to the continuous upgrading of consumption structure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31