跨设备交互场景下参照域构建方法的设计策略研究  

Research on design strategy of referential domain formulation methods in cross-device interaction

作　　者：成婉莹 袁翔[1] CHENG Wan-ying;YUAN Xiang(School of Design,Hunan University,Changsha Hunan 410000,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南大学设计与艺术学院,湖南长沙410000

出　　处：《图学学报》2021年第5期873-881,共9页Journal of Graphics

摘　　要：针对智能家居中跨设备交互的内容传输问题,从参照类型和工件数量2个方面定义交互的可见性,并在此基础上提出了4种参照域构建方法(物理的,物理耦合的,数字的,自然的)。通过“绿野仙踪”实验探究4种方法在单一任务和主次任务场景下对用户体验的影响,实验结果表明,不同方法在同一场景,以及同一方法在不同场景的用户体验有差异。得出2个方面结论:①方法的差异性,物理的方法是高效而有趣的,物理耦合的方法最有趣但实行性较低,数字的方法最实用但也是常规的,自然的方法在主次任务场景下最实用;②场景的差异性,主次任务场景中用户重点关注实用性,而用户在单一任务场景中既关注实用性也对享乐性提出了要求。Aimed at the content transfer problem of cross-device interaction in smart homes,the visibility of interaction was defined in terms of reference type and number of artifacts,and on this basis,four referential domain formulation methods(physical,coupled physical and digital,digital,and natural)were proposed.The“Wizard of Oz”experiment facilitated the exploration of the impact of four methods on the user experience in a single task scenario and primary and secondary task scenarios.The experimental results show that the difference in the user experience of different methods in the same scenario and that of the same method in different scenarios.Conclusions are drawn from two aspects:①The differences in the method:the physical is efficient and interesting,the coupled is the most interesting but not very practical,the digital is the most practical but too conventional,and the natural is the most practical in the primary and secondary task scenarios.②The difference in scenarios:users focus on practicality in the primary and secondary taskscenarios,while in the single task scenario they focus on both practicality and hedonism.

关 键 词：跨设备交互 内容传输 参照域 智能家居 用户体验 

分 类 号：TP391[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术] TB472[自动化与计算机技术—计算机科学与技术]